Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:07:38 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: Josh Carroll <josh.carroll@gmail.com>, "amd64@freebsd.org" <amd64@freebsd.org>, stable <stable@freebsd.org>, Maciej Suszko <maciej@suszko.eu> Subject: Re: -m32 broken on bi-arch amd64 systems? Message-ID: <A2C23373-71BE-4492-B3AD-42F4F25ED09A@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20081223183649.GA90840@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <7d6fde3d0812222135l753daf54geb37b696c9c1cf8@mail.gmail.com> <20081223173608.068fe9d8@suszko.eu> <8cb6106e0812230955u1bd16932h7ae4ad3fc8c97f28@mail.gmail.com> <20081223183649.GA90840@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 23, 2008, at 10:36, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:55:04PM -0500, Josh Carroll wrote: >>> I also noticed that behavior, shouldn't compiler/linker look >>> into /usr/lib32 without additional -B switch? >>> -- >>> regards, Maciej Suszko. >>> >> >> I don't know if it should or should not, but I can confirm that this >> behavior was around in 7.0-RELEASE, so it's been that way for quite a >> while, at least in the 7 branch. >> > > Sigh. Read the list archives. It's been this way since Peter > Wemm first introduce the ability to run i386 binaries on > amd64. > > -- > Steve Ok, let's bury this topic then. Thanks for the confirmation and sorry for the noise. -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A2C23373-71BE-4492-B3AD-42F4F25ED09A>