Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:49:44 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Import of tcsh into src/contrib/, replacing src/usr.bin/csh Message-ID: <200004070649.XAA39802@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <200004070210.UAA95308@harmony.village.org> from Warner Losh at "Apr 6, 2000 08:10:13 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[CC: trimmed to -arch]
> In message <20000406134916.A23265@dragon.nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes:
> : highly irritated at root's shell being one of poor UI. Of the [t]csh
> : users I know, only about 10% use csh over tcsh and that is only because
> : csh is in the base system. Those people would not even notice the extra
> : tcsh features.
I just had to go look to see if I could find some stats as the 10% number
seemed wrong to me the first time. From Freefall, what I would call a
pretty good representation of hard core BSD users :-) we have the following
stats:
freefall:rgrimes {107} ypcat passwd | grep bin/csh | wc
44 163 2965
freefall:rgrimes {108} ^cs^tcs
115 406 9409
Ahhh... 44/115 != 0.10 == 0.38 or 38%. David's statistic is off by a
factor of 3.8 :-(
--
Rod Grimes - KD7CAX @ CN85sl - (RWG25) rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004070649.XAA39802>