Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:43:37 -0400 (EDT) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@watson.org> To: Emily Ratliff <ratliff@austin.ibm.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Jason DiCioccio <jdicioccio@epylon.com>, "'Artur Meski'" <glash@freebsd.net.pl>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, robert@watson.org Subject: Re: Exec logging, FreeBSD Kernel Module. Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010717154319.46072B-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0107171429310.16870-100000@spiff.austin.ibm.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, this is exactly what I was speaking of... Thanks for the URL. On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Emily Ratliff wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Andrew R. Reiter wrote: > > Anyone have any thoughts on 1) what happened at hte BoF and 2) future of > > kernel hook standards in fbsd? > Assuming you are talking about the Kernel Security Extensions BoF see > http://lwn.net/2001/0704/security.php3 > for a LWN write-up about it. Linked off of that page is my summary of the > BoF which was posted to the (Linux) Loadable Security Module mailing list > linked off of that page. > > After the initial presentations, the discussion focused around the LSM > effort. The homepage for LSM is http://lsm.immunix.org/ > > Emily > > Emily Ratliff > IBM Linux Technology Center, Security > > *-------------................................................. | Andrew R. Reiter | arr@fledge.watson.org | "It requires a very unusual mind | to undertake the analysis of the obvious" -- A.N. Whitehead To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010717154319.46072B-100000>