Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 18:00:24 -0700 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: Trent Waddington <s337240@student.uq.edu.au>, David Johnson <djohnson@acuson.com> Cc: <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Stallman stalls again Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20010306175911.00df3c40@localhost> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.30.0103070910310.18369-100000@student.uq.edu.au > References: <3AA56AC1.90486DEB@acuson.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 04:16 PM 3/6/2001, Trent Waddington wrote: >My point was the need to recognise the difference between the use of >"Intellectual Property" in the literature and "Intellectual Property Law". >The two are very different. The former being a philosophical argument >that thoughts and ideas can be property, You're off base already. Expressions of an idea can be property; thoughts and ideas cannot. Perhaps you should read up on the topic yourself. --Brett Glass To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20010306175911.00df3c40>