Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 11:04:33 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235607] Incorrect checksums with NAT on vtnet with offloading Message-ID: <bug-235607-7501-NDSaQ8SQd6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-235607-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-235607-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235607 --- Comment #4 from Kristof Provost <kp@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #2) Right, that makes sense, and I keep forgetting that about ipfw. Does ipf have the same limitation? I'd quite like to work out if the proble= m is in vtnet of in pf. There's another report of issues that look similar and where pf doesn't app= ear to be a factor: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2019-February/284348.= html --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-235607-7501-NDSaQ8SQd6>