Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 18:14:21 +0100 From: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>, Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, alfred@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: portmap_enable vs. rpcbind_enable Message-ID: <200107311714.f6VHELc56967@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: Message from Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> of "Tue, 31 Jul 2001 10:47:51 MDT." <200107311647.f6VGlpw50279@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In message <200107311638.f6VGcFc56314@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> Brian Somers writes:
> : > In message <20010731114846.42FA73E2F@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Dima Dorfman writes:
> : > : Does anybody know (remember?) why portmap_enable (the rc.conf knob)
> : > : wasn't renamed to rpcbind_enable when portmap became rpcbind? It
> : > : seems odd to have a knob called portmap_enable that actually starts
> : > : something called rpcbind (not to mention violating POLA).
> : >
> : > Because we didn't want to break old people's config files. Also, the
^^^^^^^^^^
> : > rpcbind rename was stupid and there were people at the time that had
> : > hoped it be renamed portmap since that was a bigger pola :-)
> :
> : Are you referring to grog & bde only ?
>
> There were a fair number of people that wanted the name to remain the
> same... I want it to remaint he same, but I don't care enough to
> fight.
I was actually making a smart arse comment about your wording :*)
> Warner
--
Brian <brian@freebsd-services.com> <brian@Awfulhak.org>
http://www.freebsd-services.com/ <brian@[uk.]FreeBSD.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! <brian@[uk.]OpenBSD.org>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200107311714.f6VHELc56967>