Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 08:52:37 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> To: Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about portsdb (part of ports-mgmt/portupgrade) Message-ID: <20130622135237.GA34950@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <kq45ku$h3p$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <kq45ku$h3p$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:34:38PM +0000 I heard the voice of Walter Hurry, and lo! it spake thus: > > But the corresponding action doesn't happen on 10.0-CURRENT > (r251572) until I do a 'portsdb -Fu'. > > Why the difference? Portsnap doesn't make/distribute INDEX-10 (until 10 spirals toward -STABLE status, anyway). I just symlink it to INDEX-9... -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130622135237.GA34950>