Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 08:59:58 +0200 From: Gianmarco Giovannelli <gmarco@scotty.masternet.it> To: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mpd: PPTP call failed Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.2.20030421085241.0275c600@194.184.65.7> In-Reply-To: <200304210125.h3L1P5me035041@arch20m.dellroad.org> References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030415070820.04610eb0@194.184.65.4>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 20/04/2003, you wrote: >Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: > > bind: Can't assign requested address > >... > > > vpn: > > set link type pptp > > set pptp enable originate incoming outcall > > set pptp self 81.75.144.245 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >Most likely your mpd box doesn't own that IP address. Infact it doesn't ... it is owns by the Zyxel 645R (the wan side) which does a complete nat/pat to the inner FreeBSD box (that has IP 10.0.1.1 and the router's ethernet is 10.0.1.254). But if I can't use this address which one I should use ? The FreeBSD box has/knows only private IPs . Perhaps it is the idea behind this configuration which is wrong but I thought it could work, also because it seems to work in an other situation with only a side with a router that does the complete nat (the other side use ppp and a bridge 645M, so the wan IP address is on the tun0 device of the box). Any ideas ? Anyone else which has tried a setup like this ? Best Regards, Gianmarco Giovannelli , "Unix expert since yesterday" http://www.gufi.org/~gmarco
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.2.1.1.2.20030421085241.0275c600>