Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:45:18 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: John Kozubik <john@kozubik.com> Cc: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle Message-ID: <4F15C1BE.1060104@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201170958110.19710@kozubik.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1112211415580.19710@kozubik.com> <jf3mps$is3$1@dough.gmane.org> <CAFHbX1%2Bi3JwCCBmqtOsW6m74VpDBSAmBOt7CPcCGAPCO2DBDkA@mail.gmail.com> <CAF-QHFV8oj=ipwcsVo3e3P3kgGBPr%2Bz1gRzn3D3PT%2Bc0pHJtcQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201170958110.19710@kozubik.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/17/12 10:08 AM, John Kozubik wrote: > > Hi Ivan, > > [...] > > Fair enough. Is it the case that if funds or manpower were made > available, more releases would be workable ? Or are there some > deeper cultural leanings toward having fewer minor releases ? sure if you or someone is willing to cut releases, you can do so and I'm sure re@, given the resources (not just promised them) could do things differently. re would probably love to have people employed by someone to do the job :-) >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F15C1BE.1060104>