Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:35:08 -0700 From: Curtis Vaughan <curtis@npc-usa.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther_Dippe?= <dippe@ncm.gu.se> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port upgrading - my way Message-ID: <9B5A44EC-0E71-11D9-9B5C-000393934006@npc-usa.com> In-Reply-To: <849B94A8-0DEC-11D9-8E59-000393555914@ncm.gu.se> References: <849B94A8-0DEC-11D9-8E59-000393555914@ncm.gu.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oh, I must have had Donald's letter go into my bit bucket as I only saw=20= this message with his reply. (Donald, you reply, "Touch=E9", as I was just joking.) Anyhow, I did do it Donald's "my way" and I just like this other way=20 better for some reason. Sorry.... Curtis On 23 Sep, 2004, at 22:42, G=FCnther Dippe wrote: > Hi all, > It seems like the message below <<<< doesn't belong on this list=20 > unless > I completely misunderstood the purpose of it. > If I'm wrong please let me know. > Cheers > > <snipped> >>> Taking into consideration other issues or options pointed out >>> on the web tutorial, will this be a good strategy from now on >>> for performing good port upgrades? >>> >>> Curtis >> >> Yes - this is more or less how I do mine. > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > OK Curtis, What the heck are you doing, we just discussed this, > Chris, I know better than this and so do you. You guys are supposed > to be doing it my way. I think you're just trying to get in good > graces with the list so you show up here instead of getting > filtered into the bit bucket. > <snipped> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to=20 > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9B5A44EC-0E71-11D9-9B5C-000393934006>