Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 07:25:42 +0100 (CET) From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> To: Steve LaRocca <steve@adpcc.ds.adp.com> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Y2K Question Message-ID: <XFMail.990309072542.asmodai@wxs.nl> In-Reply-To: <005401be69ab$0f28aa80$79d37e8b@steve.adpcc.ds.adp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08-Mar-99 Steve LaRocca wrote: > We are running several instances FreeBSD 2.2.1-RELEASE (SHAZAM) #0: Fri > May 16 04:30:51 EDT 1997. I've been to the website and read through your > Y2K compliance information. However, I'm more of the PC Tech, than a > UNIX tech. My question therefore is this - based on the version that we > are running, are there any fixes/patches/upgrades necessary for us to > perform. The BIOS has been checked and passes the Y2K test we are using. Please direct your questions to freebsd-questions next time, thanks. There have been some efforts by, I thought, Danial Sobral(sp?) on the Y2k readiness and it is my firm believe that since the 2.2 branch is officially declared dead to upgrade to 3.1-STABLE which is believed to be very, very compliant. HTH, --- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <http://www.freebsdzine.org>; asmodai(at)wxs.nl The idea does not replace the work... Network/Security Specialist <http://home.wxs.nl/~asmodai>; *BSD: Powered by Knowledge & Know-how <http://www.freebsd.org>; To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.990309072542.asmodai>