Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:14:26 -0800 From: "Darren Pilgrim" <darren.pilgrim@bitfreak.org> To: "'Eric Anholt'" <eta@lclark.edu> Cc: 'Chris Gilbert' <Chris@lainos.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ATI on FreeBSD! FireGL Linux Driver Port (correction, clarification) Message-ID: <000201c60ac5$f3016db0$642a15ac@smiley> In-Reply-To: <1135671774.1065.48.camel@leguin>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Anholt [mailto:eta@lclark.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 12:23 AM > To: Darren Pilgrim > Cc: 'Chris Gilbert'; freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: ATI on FreeBSD! FireGL Linux Driver Port > (correction,clarification) > > > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 00:12 -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > > From: Darren Pilgrim > > > > > > - Ran glxgears, default window size, both drivers with > DRI disabled. > > > fglrx: ~164 FPS > > > radeon: ~670 FPS. > > > > The xorg logs indicate the radeon driver test was run without: > > > > Options "VideoOverlay" "on" > > Options "OpenGLOverlay" "off" > > > > I retested the radeon driver with the above options > specified and got the > > same performance. > > Those aren't radeon driver options (which should all be specified in > radeon(4)). True. But by the radeon(4) man page on the test system, the closest thing would be NoAccel. Testing the radeon driver, with DRI disabled, the fglrx-specific options commented out and "NoAccel" "on": 2D performance is a misnomer. glxgears: ~683 FPS If you, Chris or anyone can think of a set of options to make the radeon driver more equivalent to the fglrx driver, post 'em and I'll grind the gears.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000201c60ac5$f3016db0$642a15ac>