Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 20 Apr 1997 11:31:17 -0700
From:      mike allison <mallison@konnections.com>
To:        freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   [Fwd: Re: Commercial, Non-Hacker CD Distribution - A thought]
Message-ID:  <335A60F5.57543530@konnections.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Message-ID: <335A5CD0.706E5490@konnections.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 11:13:36 -0700
From: mike allison <mallison@konnections.com>
Organization: Publisher -- Burning Eagle Book Company
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; Linux 2.0.0 i486)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Commercial, Non-Hacker CD Distribution - A thought
References: <199704191711.NAA20533@diazepam.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Joel Ray Holveck wrote:
 >> One of my favourite aspects of Walnut Creek is the assurance that I
> >> could always get source to the programs.  Is this no longer true?
> > Huh?  How did that question come out of this discussion?
> 
> Well, if WC puts commercial software on a CD, then you wouldn't be
> getting the source with it.


Joel:

Again, I think this is common.  We don't get ALL of the source with
current distributions.  Everything that conforms to GPL offers the
source, but not everything on WC/Linux distros complies with GPL.  I
think if you DON'T see `Free' (as in No Cost) packages in the distros
(I'm speaking about Netscape and Mosaic) it's becuase the OWNERS want to
control the distribution, not because the package compilers left them
out due to GPL.

PrimeTime Freeware includes a number of packages without source which
are freely distributable and possibly Sales-worthy, but you won't get
the code.

Go back to Msrc's origianl point which, I believe, centered around
`Popular, commercial' distributions.  Meaning a non-hackers (in every
sense) could pop the disc in and run a program, just like their Dos
version.  As a way to bring in users to FreeUnix installations and make
those installations more attractive to the decision makers when picking
new installations or extensions.

We don't need the source, we need the committment and interest from the
commercial developers.  They will be scared even thinking their source
might get out...

-Mike





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?335A60F5.57543530>