Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Jan 2016 05:45:28 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 206146] fileno(3) should be implemented as a function; need to check other functions as well
Message-ID:  <bug-206146-15-dTcHvWZFBx@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-206146-15@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-206146-15@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206146

--- Comment #5 from lichray@gmail.com ---
(In reply to David Chisnall from comment #4)

Right now, to C++, the only issue left is whether the shortcut implementati=
ons
can be called, since those macros are already being guarded against
__cplusplus.  The complexity of this change went beyond my expectation.

And wrt performance, the cases actually matter are getc/putc...

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-206146-15-dTcHvWZFBx>