Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:25:49 +0000 From: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> To: Alexey Popov <llp@iteranet.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu_bsd@zeninc.net> Subject: Re: IPSEC documentation Message-ID: <20051229122549.GA11055@uk.tiscali.com> In-Reply-To: <43B38747.1060906@iteranet.com> References: <20051228143817.GA6898@uk.tiscali.com> <001401c60bc0$a3c87e90$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> <20051228153106.GA7041@uk.tiscali.com> <20051228164339.GB3875@zen.inc> <43B38747.1060906@iteranet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 09:50:47AM +0300, Alexey Popov wrote: > If we would also have NAT-T support, FreeBSD would be the best choice > of VPN concentrator. /usr/ports/security/ipsec-tools/pkg-descr says: "Known issues: - Non-threaded implementation. Simultaneous key negotiation performance should be improved." I think that would limit its usefulness as a scalable concentrator, if the comment is still valid.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051229122549.GA11055>