Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:31:37 +0300 From: "Simas Cepaitis" <simas@5ci.lt> To: <watsonmj@toomuch.com.au>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Existing Kernel Options Message-ID: <000801c1ed07$64009bc0$705ca8c0@office.5ci.lt> References: <001401c1ec47$62e51ce0$6401a8c0@intranet.toomuch.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Watson" <watsonmj@toomuch.com.au> To: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 1:53 PM Subject: FW: Existing Kernel Options > > Hi Roman > > Sorry about top-posting, hopefully I've got it right now. > > The kernel I am running from the distribution CD includes the firewall > (which I can enable using the firewall_enable="YES" option in my rc.conf > file). The GENRERIC kernel configuration off the same distribution CD does > NOT include the IPFIREWALL option. Why are you so sure that IPFIREWALL is compiled in kernel, and not loaded as a module? Try to see what 'kldstat' reports. If you just firewall_enable="YES" in rc.conf, and you don't have it in kernel, it can be loaded loaded from rc.network script. So if you can run firewall with your default kernel, it still could be GENERIC. Simas Cepaitis simas@5ci.lt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000801c1ed07$64009bc0$705ca8c0>