Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:00:15 +0300 From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling =?UTF-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@des.no> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r187332 - head/tools/regression/usr.bin/jot Message-ID: <20090117190015.8209032d.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <86ab9q14dl.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <200901161547.n0GFlZ4C012008@svn.freebsd.org> <20090117142021.92d5a40b.stas@FreeBSD.org> <86ab9q14dl.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:52:38 +0100 Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> mentioned: > Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > Was this discussed somewhere? I don't understand why we should > > restrict our filesystem naming because of limitation of auxilary > > filesystems. > > Yes. We've already renamed files that had : in their names. > > This is not just for Windows's sake, BTW: Apple's HFS and MacOS Extended > file systems are case retentive but not case sensitive. > > We should restrict filenames in the source tree (and in the installed > system) to the POSIX portable filename character set ([A-Za-z0-9._-] in > the C/POSIX locale) and avoid gratuitously long names. > A agree that names should be reasonable, that's exactly my point here. Renaming wX to wx1 doesn't look reasonable to me, given the names of files corresponds to the options used in the test. - -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAklyAI8ACgkQK/VZk+smlYHTWACeKBnfvdJ8wbgWwj5oUQMBxQcc 9LEAnjxE2fILzl/nvsMfIys+82PL5owV =NOf1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- !DSPAM:49720092967001229610785!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090117190015.8209032d.stas>