Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 08:35:20 +0100 From: Burbaickij Ariel <Ariel.Burbaickij@erl9.siemens.de> To: "'wpaul@FreeBSD.ORG'" <wpaul@freebsd.org> Cc: "'freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org> Subject: AW: Information I was requested for Message-ID: <1F69DAAD3391D411BE5300805FBED48B496BF9@ERLM511A.erl9.siemens.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: wpaul@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:wpaul@FreeBSD.ORG]
Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2000 23:57
An: Ariel.Burbaickij@erl9.siemens.de
Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG
Betreff: Re: Information I was requested for
> xe0 at port 0x240-0x24f iomem 0xd0000-0xd0fff irq 5 slot 0 on pccard0
> xe0: Compaq CE3 , bonding version 0x45 , 100Mbps capable
> xe0: DingoID = 0x44b , RevisionID = 0 , VendorID = 0
> xe0: Ethernet address 00:08:c7:0c:7c:b6
> /etc/pccard_ether: not found
Alright, so this is a Xircom PCMCIA card with a Compaq label on it. There
are two possible problems (and I'm guessing here since I didn't write this
driver):
1) The media is set wrong, and you need to specify the right media
using ifconfig options when sysinstall asks you.
Media is not set wrong because it was not set at all. It was DHCP
task to provide whatever neccesary.It failed.
2) Some other device is using IRQ 5 on your machine. You need to either
turn off whatever hardware is using IRQ 5, or convince FreeBSD to
assign a different IRQ to the card.
No other device is using IRQ 5 (besides even if . Why I was not informed
about it?
Why was irq 5 choosen by system silently without warning me? I guess it
is not
so desperately hard to find whether the irq is already used or not)
So I do not see any senseful suggestions so far.
-Bill
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1F69DAAD3391D411BE5300805FBED48B496BF9>
