Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:08:57 -0700 From: Chris Stankevitz <cstankevitz@toyon.com> To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Packages available for different FreeBSD versions Message-ID: <4A89D4F9.9020508@toyon.com> In-Reply-To: <A1943023-5226-47E0-AB2F-B72814260687@mac.com> References: <4A89BD3E.8020804@toyon.com><d356c5630908171342m4c8469dcw6a64c5d2a5990457@mail.gmail.com><4A89CA18.7000506@toyon.com> <A1943023-5226-47E0-AB2F-B72814260687@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chuck, Thank you for your help. I have two questions: Chuck Swiger wrote: > Ports are not branched-- there is no STABLE or CURRENT for ports. The > same ports tree can be used on 6.x, 7.x, and 8-CURRENT. 1. With what is the STABLE/CURRENT tag associated? a) "core operating system version number" b) the ports collection c) something else >> What are the repercussions of never updating the "core operating >> system version number"? > > Well, you'll miss ongoing security updates and improvements to the > system. 2. I thought security updates and improvements to the system would arrive via the ports mechanism. What kinds of things are not updated via ports? (My experience is with Gentoo where everything is updated via portage and there is no "core operating system version number"). Thanks again, Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A89D4F9.9020508>