Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:07:40 -0700
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru>
Cc:        "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [rfc] removing the NDISulator
Message-ID:  <CAJ-VmomrBCj5opCDEOCjOkmY84uCdqamC%2BQ1me0CGbjLpaf%2BHg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5265878B.1050809@yandex.ru>
References:  <CAJ-Vmo=ZO9aTMjaD0aZ8f-7CbTqLrYUkrHE3%2Bvpx2-6jDDYtiQ@mail.gmail.com> <81.4D.19454.84022625@cdptpa-oedge03> <5265878B.1050809@yandex.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21 October 2013 12:59, Andrey V. Elsukov <bu7cher@yandex.ru> wrote:

> On 19.10.2013 10:01, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > I too would like to see more effort writing new Ethernet and wifi
> > drivers and porting from other operating systems.
> >
> > But I would like to keep the NDISulator/NDISwrapper as a fallback.
> >
> > There are still wifi adapters, Ethernet too, where there is no
> > FreeBSD driver (AR9271 for instance), or the FreeBSD driver is
> > buggy.
>
> I'm agree. While there are still some devices without native drivers,
> but that work via NDISulator, we should keep it.
>

It's honestly about time that these were updated, fixed and/or ported to
FreeBSD.

So, I'm still going forward with the plan. I won't be killing it during the
10 lifecycle.




-adrian



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomrBCj5opCDEOCjOkmY84uCdqamC%2BQ1me0CGbjLpaf%2BHg>