Date: Sun, 2 Apr 1995 06:50:12 +1000 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: freebsd-bugs@freefall.cdrom.com, j@uriah.heep.sax.de Subject: Re: kern/290: latest sio change broke slattach(8) Message-ID: <199504012050.GAA20113@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>The latest sio changes obviously broke the SLIP line discipline. >Slattach(8) complains: >Apr 1 21:48:55 uriah slattach[150]: cannot get carrier state: Inappropriate ioctl for device >Apr 1 21:48:55 uriah slattach[150]: Waiting for carrier on /dev/cuaa1 (sl-1) I'll fix this in a few minutes. sltioctl() now returns ENOTTY for ioctls that it doesn't know about. It's supposed to return -1 like it used to so that such ioctls can be handled by higher layer(s). BTW, slioctl() (a different function) returns EINVAL for ioctls that it doesn't know about. Shouldn't it return ENOTTY? Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504012050.GAA20113>