Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Mike Harding <mvh@ix.netcom.com>
To:        marcus@marcuscom.com
Cc:        sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG, gnome@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Please TEST changes to files!!!! panel-- doesn't work
Message-ID:  <20020716174753.BC53613109@netcom1.netcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <1026838198.311.5.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> (message from Joe Marcus Clarke on 16 Jul 2002 12:49:49 -0400)
References:  <20020716142840.9E2E013109@netcom1.netcom.com> <3D343F30.7D134348@FreeBSD.org>  <20020716160653.615C013109@netcom1.netcom.com> <1026838198.311.5.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

I do appreciate the work!  I was just pointing out that a simple

make clean
make
( if it works, make clean and commit)

before committing might be a good idea - in this case, the patches
were not quite right.

- Mike H.

   From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
   Cc: sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG, gnome@FreeBSD.ORG
   Date: 16 Jul 2002 12:49:49 -0400
   Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG
   X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG
   X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0
	   tests=IN_REP_TO,PLING_PLING,PLING,AWL
	   version=2.31
   X-Spam-Level: 

   On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 12:06, Mike Harding wrote:
   > 
   > Yeah, but I am losing hair!
   > 
   > Is there some way that gnome changes can be quarantined until tested,
   > or something?  A simple 'make' before a commit would be good,
   > even... ;)

   The *-- ports are tricky.  If you try to patch after make configure (I
   think) you may be tricked into patching dynamically generated sources.

   Like Maxim said, we appreciate the bug reports, and we always try to be
   careful.  Sometimes we miss things.  There, after all, only two of us
   committing stuff, and we always try to be quick with these kind of
   fixes.

   Please bare with us.

   Joe

   > 
   > - Mike H.
   > 
   >    Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 18:43:44 +0300
   >    From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
   >    Organization: Vega International Capital
   >    X-Accept-Language: en,uk,ru
   >    Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org
   >    X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0
   > 	   tests=PLING_PLING,PLING,ROUND_THE_WORLD,AWL
   > 	   version=2.31
   >    X-Spam-Level: *
   > 
   >    OOPS, I am really sorry. I did not notice that these files are
   >    actually auto-generated ones, so that their real sources have to be
   >    patched instead. Mea culpa and I will try to be more careful in the
   >    future.
   > 
   >    Thank you for reporting - your reports are really appreciated!
   > 
   >    -Maxim
   > 
   >    Mike Harding wrote:
   >    > 
   >    > Max - please test changes before checking in... I may switch to KDE
   >    > because gnome doesn't build half the time, and a lot of the problems
   >    > are very simple, a 'make clean && make' would at least be a good test.
   >    > 
   >    > I tend to rip out the base ports, like gnomelibs, and rebuild, but I
   >    > can be out of commmision for hours because of stuff like this.
   >    > 
   >    > Also, you don't bump the point release so I can test that ports build
   >    > before I rebuild - I had tested gnomelibs, which was the only one that
   >    > had a version bump, and the compile died elsewhere.
   >    > 
   >    > - MIke H.
   >    > 
   >    > /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/panel-- doesn't build because the patch files
   >    > are not correct...
   >    > 
   >    > netcom1# ===>  Extracting for panelmm-0.3.1
   >    > >> Checksum OK for gnome/panelmm-0.3.1.tar.gz.
   >    > ===>   panelmm-0.3.1 depends on executable: gmake - found
   >    > ===>   panelmm-0.3.1 depends on file: /usr/X11R6/bin/gnomecc - found
   >    > ===>   panelmm-0.3.1 depends on shared library: gnomemm.9 - not found
   >    > ===>    Verifying install for gnomemm.9 in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gnome--
   >    > ===>  Extracting for gnomemm-1.2.2
   >    > >> Checksum OK for gnomemm-1.2.2.tar.bz2.
   >    > ===>   gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on executable: gm4 - found
   >    > ===>   gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on executable: gmake - found
   >    > ===>   gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on executable: libtool - found
   >    > ===>   gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on file: /usr/X11R6/bin/gnomecc - found
   >    > ===>   gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on shared library: gtkmm.2 - found
   >    > ===>   gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on shared library: X11.6 - found
   >    > ===>   gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on shared library: esd.2 - found
   >    > ===>   gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on shared library: glib12.3 - found
   >    > ===>   gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on shared library: gtk12.2 - found
   >    > ===>   gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on shared library: Imlib.5 - found
   >    > ===>   gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on shared library: gnome.5 - found
   >    > ===>   gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on shared library: panel_status.5 - found
   >    > ===>   gnomemm-1.2.2 depends on shared library: gtkhtml.21 - found
   >    > ===>  Patching for gnomemm-1.2.2
   >    > ===>  Applying FreeBSD patches for gnomemm-1.2.2
   >    > File to patch:
   >    > 
   >    > or
   >    > 
   >    > No file to patch.  Skipping...
   >    > 3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to src/gnome--/app.cc.rej
   >    > >> Patch patch-src::gnome--::app.cc failed to apply cleanly.
   >    > >> Patch(es) patch-Makefile.in patch-aa patch-src::gnome--::affinetrans.cc applied cleanly.
   >    > *** Error code 1
   >    > 
   >    > depending how I invoke it.
   > 
   > 
   > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
   > with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message
   > 
   -- 
   PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc


   To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
   with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020716174753.BC53613109>