Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 10:37:34 -0700 From: "Andrew W. Flury" <aflury@nas.nasa.gov> To: Holtor <holtor@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bug in SMP Kernel in 3.1, was it fixed in 3.2? Message-ID: <199906031737.KAA24105@madrugada.nas.nasa.gov> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 03 Jun 1999 03:44:48 PDT." <19990603104448.24898.rocketmail@web118.yahoomail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've seen the same symptoms on a 3.2-STABLE (as of 5/30, and yes, world is in sync with the kernel) machine with two PII's on an Asus P2B-D motherboard. To see what it's doing in a little more detail, I tried rebooting then immediately starting a process that ate up 100% of one of the CPUs. As soon as it was started, I ran top. What I saw that it was initially at 50% CPU usage (which it should be), but then gradually decreased until it was at 0.00%. After that point, every process was at 0.00% usage, even though they were all still running just fine. The CPU states were also all at 0.0%. I can provide more detailed information on my config upon request. > Hi guys & gals, > > Right when I found out freebsd supported more then one > processor, I put together my first dual processor > machine. At the time I installed 3.1-release, then > upgraded that to 3.1-stable. What I noticied was > if I checked a users 'ps' info, or 'top' for stats > of certain processes running, they ALL said they > were using 0.00% cpu usage, which is not correct. > CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, > 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle > For example..then everything users were running > was 0.00% too, so if something went haywire its very > hard to tell. > > My question is, was this fixed in 3.2-stable? > > Thanks, > Holt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199906031737.KAA24105>