Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 10:30:42 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: FreeBSD User <freebsd@walstatt-de.de> Cc: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws>, FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Subject: Re: CURRENT: kernel panic in IPFW while stopping jails Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmonw6w-px2rbN8K%2BbtLc=eS0=6vAJSG2D5ZvcbhhhqBRAQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20251225190836.6769e6d6@hermann> References: <20251225170828.7aef61df@hermann> <902742484.3865.1766683845222@localhost> <20251225190836.6769e6d6@hermann>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, 25 Dec 2025 at 10:09, FreeBSD User <freebsd@walstatt-de.de> wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Dec 2025 18:30:45 +0100 (CET) > Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> wrote: > > > Do you use bpf or tap in your ipfw rules? > > A panic with that was mentioned on the 20th. And fixed in the mean time of I > > remember correctly. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=291854 > > Regards,Ronald > > Indeed, all boxes in question do have a tap0 at least defined -but in only one > case used. glebius@ did a bunch of bpf cleanup/refactoring in preparation for other work and there was some fallout. If you update to today's -HEAD and it's still broken then please file a bug and poke him about it so he can address it! -adrianhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmonw6w-px2rbN8K%2BbtLc=eS0=6vAJSG2D5ZvcbhhhqBRAQ>