Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:32:59 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Xin LI <delphij@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: truss status (was: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/lmc if_lmc.h) Message-ID: <20060724000259.GE16230@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <8664hrtcv1.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <200607210845.k6L8j0Ep026008@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060721062609.356f090f.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <8664hrtcv1.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--5xSkJheCpeK0RUEJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Friday, 21 July 2006 at 13:29:38 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote: > Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> writes: >> Wait. I'm lost. Isn't truss(1) broken on FreeBSD? > > Depends on your definition of broken. It kind of works provided you > have /proc mounted. Still, there's really not much point in using it; > ktrace(1) is better in almost all respects. truss is good in that it gives immediate output. I used it recently under 6.1, and I somehow missed that it was broken. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --5xSkJheCpeK0RUEJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFExA4zIubykFB6QiMRAoImAJ0QRVwJ7s++3yLC9l8NKHBezuM5VACeI3VT Yoz4gIcZ0UyQkwgw4yoPMnk= =M2Hv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5xSkJheCpeK0RUEJ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060724000259.GE16230>