Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 10:21:12 -0800 From: Michael Dexter <editor@callfortesting.org> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WITHOUT_CASPER ghost? Message-ID: <e021c9dd-f47a-4135-af2a-00b4092d511e@callfortesting.org> In-Reply-To: <ZdjSO4_CYSlAw10x@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <8f2d4d8c-9c93-42be-b67b-2495cb027c8f@callfortesting.org> <ZdjSO4_CYSlAw10x@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/23/24 9:13 AM, Brooks Davis wrote: > Things are in a somewhat messy state. CASPER and CAPSICUM were moved to > a new __REQUIRED_OPTIONS list, but the various bits still exist and > there's even one use of MK_CASPER=no in Makefile.inc1. The commit > message (c24c117b9644) suggests that the intent was to finish removal > after 14 branched and it just hasn't happened yet. Understood. > I do wonder if the tool would also benefit from learning about > __REQUIRED_OPTIONS. By required do you mean WITHOUT_AUTO_OBJ, WITHOUT_UNIFIED_OBJDIR, WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB which I manually skip/mask my build option testing? If so, what syntax would use __REQUIRED_OPTIONS and what branches support it? Michael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e021c9dd-f47a-4135-af2a-00b4092d511e>