Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 13:19:38 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik <mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkgng: how to upgrade a single port? Message-ID: <5277E53A.4090208@intertainservices.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BdUSyoUQB%2BgLM8g70y6mz7c%2BHSb3DJpVFvaENgm45VwcYVjQA@mail.gmail.com> References: <527406D2.7010200@intertainservices.com> <1383336649.16326.41750369.298F8E9D@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1383337118.18823.41752849.2502EBFD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CA%2BdUSyoUQB%2BgLM8g70y6mz7c%2BHSb3DJpVFvaENgm45VwcYVjQA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/03/13 17:24, George Kontostanos wrote: > You can alway lock a package or the packages that you don't need to > upgrade. See: "pkg help lock" > Thanks for the info but that would be very tedious to do. Is it just me or is this a gross oversight of this new pkg system? Also the fact that with a pkg you can not choose any options for the port, you have to install with options that the port maintainer chose. As it stands now if i do pkg upgrade it wants to pull in a bunch of stuff that i do not want, also it wants to re-install just about everything because of a "direct dependency changed", im not sure this is correct as it wanted to re-install pkg itself just after I freshly installed it from ports.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5277E53A.4090208>