Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:18:47 -0800 From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Next release should be called 5.0 (was:4.4 BSD forever?) Message-ID: <200001201918.LAA16321@windsor.research.att.com> References: <200001111107.MAA09106@114046.kema.nl> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10001111232020.80351-100000@ramstind.gtf.ol.no> <20000111040500.A46259@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nothing like resurrecting a week-dead thread, huh? I thought that I had picked up somewhere that Berkeley's agreement with USL didn't allow major releases without renegotiating the license, but patches were considered to be OK, so the 4.x releases were all deemed to be "patches" to 4BSD. Perhaps this is a BSD urban legend? Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001201918.LAA16321>