Date: 13 Mar 2002 11:31:45 -0800 From: Mark Foster <mdf@enic.cc> To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Managing port security upgrades (was:Re: PHP 4.1.2) Message-ID: <1016047905.6825.34.camel@smokey.lan.enic.cc> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0203131400540.5001-100000@vapour.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0203131400540.5001-100000@vapour.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sounds alot like pkg_version -c -v | sh (assuming an updated ports tree) On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 11:07, batz wrote: > On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Adam Wight wrote: > > :What about a new make target, "upgrade," that only sync'ed the ports > :subtree for the port being built and its dependencies? > > Hrm, so it would be implemented in the makefiles of the entire ports > collection? A top level makefile or one in each port? > > I was thinking about this a bit more, and it occured to me that > using /var/db/pkg as a reference point, and either sup'ing a new > port, which would then get a sort of 'reverse dependancies' list, > from /var/db/pkg/portname/+REQUIRED_BY, and selectively upgrading > anything in there which had the original port as a dependancy. > > That sounds like it might run into problems with recursion, thoughts? > > > > -- > batz > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message -- -mdf [Mark D. Foster] Phone: 206-381-0449 System Administrator - eNIC Corporation Fax: 206-329-7107 <mdf@enic.cc> or mergatroid on AIM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1016047905.6825.34.camel>