Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:35:03 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 229393] ports-mgmt/pkg: Show which options changed if upgrade needed Message-ID: <bug-229393-32340@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229393 Bug ID: 229393 Summary: ports-mgmt/pkg: Show which options changed if upgrade needed Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: pkg@FreeBSD.org Reporter: andreas.sommer87@googlemail.com CC: grembo@FreeBSD.org Assignee: pkg@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(pkg@FreeBSD.org) Created attachment 194710 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=194710&action=edit Verbose output before/after for changed options `pkg upgrade` detects changed options in a package and requires reinstallation, but only shows minimal information about the reason: Installed packages to be REINSTALLED: mypackage-1.11 (options changed) This patch prints before/after options and their values so the sysadmin can clearly see why a package is reinstalled. Why? Building production packages yourself with regular ports tree updates and custom options can often lead to this case, and when doing live deployments, you want to be sure that no critical options have been altered. I wanted to combine this with {-v,--verbose}, but apparently `pkg upgrade {-v,--vulnerable}` already exists, overriding the default expectation of 'v' option meaning verbose. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-229393-32340>
