Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 14:48:13 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: proff@suburbia.net (Julian Assange) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: virtual hosting with inetd Message-ID: <199611102148.OAA16959@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199611090643.RAA23191@suburbia.net> from "Julian Assange" at Nov 9, 96 05:43:35 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Does anyone have any other comments on the patch > I produced? Terry, did I address yours? > Is it commitable? Well, you addressed mine... I didn't necessarily agree with all your points, but the one about external daemons was a good one. The state question I think is still valid, escpecially for long conf files. I still don't see why if you are ging to implement an "#include" type syntax for files that they have to have the first line a bind line; an #include is an #include. I also find it a little strange that you just don't implement a #include keyword instead of implying it with a sh "<" construct. Other than that, xinetd is already in ports, and I thought that inetd was maintained at Cray along with telnet and the other services... Other than that, no, I have no problems. 8-). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611102148.OAA16959>