Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 22:16:22 +0400 From: Vladimir Uralsky <uwl@lanck.ru> To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /usr/sbin/named Message-ID: <19980601221622.06118@lanck.ru> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.iB1.0.980531235510.7174A-100000@alpha.sea-to-sky.net>; from Steve Reid on Sun, May 31, 1998 at 11:56:23PM -0700 References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.iB1.0.980531235510.7174A-100000@alpha.sea-to-sky.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 31, 1998 at 11:56:23PM -0700, Steve Reid wrote: > Is /usr/sbin/named as distributed with FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE vulnerable > to known exploits? > > Strings shows the version as 4.9.6-REL and a recent Bugtraq post listed > this version as exploitable. However, although the _version_ is the same > between my 2.2.6-RELEASE and 2.2.5-RELEASE machines, the _dates_ are > different. Is /usr/sbin/named in 2.2.6-RELEASE fixed? Today's stable contain a 4.9.7 but without compat directory, I had only a few time to see it and don't understand is it a bug in source directory tree or in my arms ;-) -- Vova. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980601221622.06118>