Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 24 Feb 2002 18:15:24 +1100 (Australia/ACT)
From:      Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
To:        lee.brotherston@uk.easynet.net (Lee Brotherston)
Cc:        freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG ('freebsd-security@freebsd.org')
Subject:   Re: ipf transparently
Message-ID:  <200202240715.SAA12448@caligula.anu.edu.au>
In-Reply-To: <002b01c1bcc6$a952b1c0$a2daccd9@nerds.org.uk> from "Lee Brotherston" at Feb 24, 2002 12:03:17 AM

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some mail from Lee Brotherston, sie said:
> 
> Apologies in advance if I'm missing something really obvious here.
> But I've setup my FreeBSD box to be a bridge, and has both ipfw and
> ipf compiled into the kernel.  The bridging works perfectly and if I
> set the following using sysctl I can filter the bridged traffic with
> ipfw fine.
> 
> net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw: 1
> 
> However I have not been able to find where to set a similar option to
> allow ipf to filter the traffic.  I tried just applying some rules
> incase, and they had no effect.

Someone (probably me) needs to make the bridge hooks work for ipf.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200202240715.SAA12448>