Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 12:09:11 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Acronyms believed harmful Message-ID: <20040709120642.J56489@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <20040709125207.66591fc2.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <200407091038.52304.zettel@acm.org> <20040709160642.GB29928@submonkey.net> <20040709125207.66591fc2.wmoran@potentialtech.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Bill Moran wrote: > Before I start, I have a policy question: If we look at tech terms > that are NOT FreeBSD-specific (such as DTD) should the FreeBSD > glossary contain a full definition, or possibly a link to another > source? Let me suggest both: a quick definition and then a link to another source for more information. For example: DTD: Document Type Definition. See (link to xml.org or some place more generic). -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USAhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040709120642.J56489>