Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 17:27:55 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> To: cem@FreeBSD.org Cc: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r292454 - head/bin/ed Message-ID: <CC23C649-9CA1-44B5-8531-51F8BF2B8942@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAG6CVpWMXqzW6qBL2wE9e_ezjKF6WauMHsK-yb66yNUNvYOhaQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201512182158.tBILwhRB040583@repo.freebsd.org> <44E9BE06-1883-4AF8-816D-D699CF733EEB@bsdimp.com> <DCA75AAB-5752-44E4-90B9-FC33404EA350@FreeBSD.org> <CAG6CVpWMXqzW6qBL2wE9e_ezjKF6WauMHsK-yb66yNUNvYOhaQ@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> On Dec 18, 2015, at 15:46, Conrad Meyer <cem@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org> wrote: >> Hi Warner; >> >>> Il giorno 18/dic/2015, alle ore 17:01, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> ha scritto: >>> >>> Isnft strlcpy() the more appropriate interface? strncpy doesnft guarantee NUL termination. >> >> Maybe, but we were using strcpy() which doesnft guarantee NULL termination either >> and things have been working. I also thought that portability may be specially important >> for the stuff in bin/. > > strcpy() does guarantee NUL termination. Otherwise it would be useless. > > DESCRIPTION > The stpcpy() and strcpy() functions copy the string src to dst (including > the terminating e\0f character.) +1 to using strlcpy instead of strcpy/strncpy. Thanks!help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CC23C649-9CA1-44B5-8531-51F8BF2B8942>
