Date: 11 Mar 2004 09:25:16 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Robert Fitzpatrick <robert@webtent.com> Cc: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: kernel arp errors Message-ID: <44wu5rmpf7.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <1078934067.3686.44.camel@columbus> References: <1078934067.3686.44.camel@columbus>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Fitzpatrick <robert@webtent.com> writes: > I am running 5.2.1 with two NIC's, both connected to a Cisco switch with > a Cisco router also connected to the switch for Internet connectivity. > There are 5 eth ports on the router, one of them with an address > assigned of 66.129.101.193/28 and another with 66.129.101.217/29, the > other eth ports are the ISP connection and other one other subnet. One > port not used. On the FreeBSD host, the two NIC's are assigned with em0 > as 66.129.101.198/28 and em1 as 66.129.101.219/29. These are the > messages I am getting over and over, note the IP's are those of the > router: > > Mar 10 10:35:49 esmtp kernel: arp: 66.129.101.193 is on em0 but got > reply from 00:30:94:32:94:30 on em1 > Mar 10 10:35:51 esmtp kernel: arp: 66.129.101.217 is on em1 but got reply from 00:30:94:32:94:32 on em0 It sounds like those NICs are hooked up to the same wire, which doesn't make sense...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44wu5rmpf7.fsf>