Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:18:55 -0500 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: Rob <spamrefuse@yahoo.com> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: gtkextra-0.99.17_1 Message-ID: <op.sysyhtjf9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <20051017095731.68011.qmail@web36208.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20051017095731.68011.qmail@web36208.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:57:31 -0500, Rob <spamrefuse@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 22:49 -0700, Rob wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Gtkextra has been upgraded a while ago. >> > It's now at version 2.1.1. >> > >> > Attached is a kind of upgraded port, but it >> > may still need tweaking of the pkg-plist file, >> > because I don't understand what it says about >> > 'manually tidying up' in the Porter's Handbook. >> > >> > Please have a look and upgrade the port soon. >> > >> > If this is an acceptable way of providing a port >> > upgrade, I will follow up with an upgrade of the >> > scigraphica port. >> >> You should submit these upgrades in a PR. That way, >> it's easy to track, >> and we can actually see your patch (the mailing list >> ate your attachment). > > OK, done that; don't know if it then reaches the > right person; let's see. > > The patch is now also here: > http://surfion.snu.ac.kr/~lahaye/gtkextra.patch This patch doesn't look right. Isn't new gtkextra 2.x supposed to be depends on GTK2 instead GTK1? The plist doesn't look right too. I think, it might break other ports so it's best to have a repocopy from gtkextra -> gtkextra20, they don't conflict to the each others. Unless, you can update all other ports to use new gtkextra. Cheers, Mezz > Cheers, > Rob. -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.sysyhtjf9aq2h7>