Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:30:10 +0700 From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7+ days of dogfood Message-ID: <20130210083010.7df5b997@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <20130210000723.GA73630@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20130210000723.GA73630@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 16:07:23 -0800 Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > actual real-world conditions. In his words, FreeBSD should "eat its > own dogfood." The new installation on FreeBSD.org, of course, would I am on dog food since last May/June. How should I phrase it? Every can tastes different. Most cans have a perfect taste but some cans are really off. So, when I see a bad can, I go back to my old can, wait a day and get me then a new can. This is then - most likely - good again. This is the real reason why it is not possible to run important machines on dog food. If one can is bad, the machine is down. As FreeBSD.org sits next to the canning machine, it can run on dog food. Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130210083010.7df5b997>