Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 19:35:57 +0800 From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/sys aio_return.2 Message-ID: <200610071935.57947.davidxu@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20061007083131.GA82415@rambler-co.ru> References: <200610070534.k975Yq52033812@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061007083131.GA82415@rambler-co.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 07 October 2006 16:31, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > I think this is a deficiency in the standard; I'd expect that > for in-progress operations, aio_return() returned -1 and set > errno == EINPROGRESS, and allowed to be called again. > > > Cheers, I saw HP-UX returns EINPROCESS but Solaris does not unless they changed it, I would like to obey POSIX standard, returns EINVAL as CURRENT does.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200610071935.57947.davidxu>