Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 17:21:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek <ac199@hwcn.org> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-CVSROOT@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT avail Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980513170748.280A-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <19980513160453.34115@follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 13 May 1998, Eivind Eklund wrote: > * bento.freebsd.org - Testbox running -current. You can (supposedly, > I haven't tested) get root access on bento if you can convince > Satoshi that you need it to build & test things. But don't use cvs ci on it! Would it be a security hazard to add another key to /home/~/.ssh/authorized_keys, and keep the only matching private key in /home/~/.ssh/identity, both on freefall? Particularly if the identity is unencrypted? It seems to me that if someone breaks into [bento|hub|freefall|kickme].freebsd.org, the rest are quite compromised, anyways. However, I want to check... [The idea, of course, is to make cvs work seamlessly over *.freebsd.org, save of course unavoidable network bandwidth usage] That, and are the only -stable machines left hub and freefall? That kinda sucks for any potential testing... -- This .sig is not innovative, witty, or profund.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980513170748.280A-100000>