Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 1 Feb 2004 17:50:04 +1100
From:      Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org>
To:        Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de>
Cc:        "Greg J." <xcas@cox.net>
Subject:   Re: mounting msdos partitions buggy?
Message-ID:  <20040201065004.GA31325@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
In-Reply-To: <200402010345.15476@harrymail>
References:  <20040128075639.32890e82.xcas@cox.net> <20040131152608.GA28862@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20040131092534.0ba836b2.xcas@cox.net> <200402010345.15476@harrymail>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 03:45:15AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:

Content-Description: signed data
> On Saturday 31 January 2004 17:25, Greg J. wrote:
> > On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 02:26:08 +1100
> >
> > Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > > Try this patch. I'm pretty sure that the problem is that an int * is
> > > bogusly cast to a size_t * in a few places in msdosfs_conv.c,
> > > but I don't have an amd64 system myself, so I haven't been able to
> > > test it.
> >
> > That did the trick.. thanks.
> 
> How are things usually going? Will this patch be commited to current?
> Or are more testers needed (haven't followed the thread (my skill-level told 
> me at some pont to quit) but I also had serious fd problems).
> I'm tracking current so I'll be testing it if it gets commited.

I'll commit the patch after I've had some more time to check that I
haven't introduced any signedness errors etc.


Tim



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040201065004.GA31325>