Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2022 21:17:19 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 260868] possible i386 regression after ce35a3bc852d25cb989bc1f3dc4ddb723d7d5117 Message-ID: <bug-260868-227-NYkMaisbC5@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-260868-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-260868-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D260868 Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |markj@FreeBSD.org Status|New |Open --- Comment #1 from Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org> --- I think I see the problem. We're calibrating using the i8254 timer, and the corresponding timecounter has a pretty narrow mask so wraparound can occur multiple times. I wonder if we should just skip late calibration if the i8= 254 is the only reference clock. Could you please show a verbose dmesg from the broken kernel? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-260868-227-NYkMaisbC5>