Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:04:07 +0100
From:      Mark Martinec <Mark.Martinec+freebsd@ijs.si>
To:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD network optimization project
Message-ID:  <3e8485b5832510b4781ea15fea2af849@mailbox.ijs.si>
In-Reply-To: <52D651D6.8060605@smartspb.net>
References:  <CAH6gFOnczbNec6MS6nS1ed7z%2BmXL2BA0UN_vwHf3YbCHtpb2TA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BhQ2%2Bg7D6Su=C6XGcaUC6NuZbDKKQHXhO-4AWeatzmXi79tSA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BhQ2%2Bj2aBuGEY26yD%2BA6_8EUqY1Xhq4cFuZCL-YPn8TdPMPmA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH6gFOkdKoozLa=NYWsps4WFrvwnUh9COEuCkEv%2BxAiZ=r7O1Q@mail.gmail.com> <52D637E0.8070603@smartspb.net> <1389771099.940290294.rj98b435@frv34.ukr.net> <52D651D6.8060605@smartspb.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2014-01-15, Dennis Yusupoff wrote:
> Currently? I thinks it's the only way. And please, remember about
> external ftp-proxy helper, which is far from ideal and should to be
> replaced or at least fixed for work in CGN cases.
> Moreover, we should to understand that coming time for CGN
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrier-grade_NAT) to work from
> IPv6-only networks in IPv4 networks.

CGN?  Shudder to think of it!

May be interesting to look at the Deutsche Telekom's TeraStream project
when re-designing an ISP offering:

http://blog.ipspace.net/2013/11/deutsche-telekom-terastream-designed.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUebF3UJiU4

http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/dts-ian-farrer-on-the-all-ipv6-terastream-network/

http://www.laboratories.telekom.com/public/English/Newsroom/news/pages/terastream-feldtest.aspx




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3e8485b5832510b4781ea15fea2af849>