Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 12:06:30 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@chello.cz> To: Garance A Drosehn <gad@FreeBSD.org> Cc: peter@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: MFCs needed in src/sys/sys/cdefs.h Message-ID: <20040410100630.GA381@isis.wad.cz> In-Reply-To: <p06020406bc9d1d3f21c7@[128.113.24.47]> References: <20040409205016.GA6183@isis.wad.cz> <p06020406bc9d1d3f21c7@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# gad@FreeBSD.org / 2004-04-10 01:01:26 -0400:
> At 10:50 PM +0200 4/9/04, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> >This is an extended version of my previous email to hackers@
> >which hasn't attracted any attention. This time I'm mailing
> >the authors too.
>
> I must have missed the earlier message...
Perhaps because I was only talking about the peter's commit? :)
> >Two revisions need MFC in src/sys/sys/cdefs.h:
> >
> >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/sys/cdefs.h.diff?r1=1.78&r2=1.79
> >
> >Silences gobs of warnings in just about any libtool-using software.
> >
> >Fix for CURRENT commited: (5 months, 1 week ago) by peter.
>
> I have no opinion on this. It looks fine to me.
It's unfortunate we're frozen now, but I don't really care if it
gets merged now or when the freeze is lifted, someone just MFC it
please. I was tinkering with some ports last week, and the sheer
number of occurrences of those warnings almost made me roll over.
Google didn't prove very useful beyound showing that the internet is
full of them (think archived failed build reports, various
bento-like systems, etc), all FreeBSD.
As for the change you made, I agree it's not worth the trouble.
--
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040410100630.GA381>