Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 23:24:48 +0100 From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: "David E . O'Brien" <obrien@nuxi.com> Subject: Re: LSOF import into base system? Message-ID: <19990223232448.A36271@keltia.freenix.fr> In-Reply-To: <19990223011842.B29230@dragon.nuxi.com>; from David E . O'Brien on Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 01:18:42AM -0800 References: <199902221734.JAA21318@vashon.polstra.com> <199902221758.TAA36742@greenpeace.grondar.za> <19990223011842.B29230@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to David E . O'Brien: > If people feel this is desired, I can easily bmake and import it. > >From working with Vic Abell, I know he is interested in any > problems/issues that we may find in LSOF if we find issues when > scrutinizing it. Well, the way I see it, Vic is already maintaining LSOF for so many platforms that I don't see any real advantage in importing it. As long as he can sync with FreeBSD internal changes (and he can because he has access to such systems -- thanks you for that), we have a a working lsof. That way, Vic doesn't have divergent versions (you don't plan to update contrib/lsof for each change Vic makes to other platforms don't you ?). To be honest, I would not miss fstat(1), even if it is good ol' BSD code, I install lsof everywhere. Putting lsof features into fstat is just IMO a waste of time and code. Now, can we import Postfix instead ? :-) :-) [ducks and runs] -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #69: Mon Jan 18 02:02:12 CET 1999 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990223232448.A36271>