Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 08:08:43 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> Cc: Mark Newton <newton@atdot.dotat.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IRQ sharing with newbus Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9906020807140.411-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9906011938030.423-100000@sasami.jurai.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Doug Rabson wrote: > > For EISA, it should be possible to add RF_SHAREABLE to the > > bus_alloc_resource call (assuming that EISA interrupts are shareable > > like pci interrupts). > > The observed behavior suggests that RF_SHAREABLE is not being honored. > > dpt99: DPT PM2022A/9X FW Rev. 07CK, 1 channel, 64 CCBs > dpt0: <DPT PM2x22A/9X> at slot 4 on eisa0 > dpt0: DPT PM2022A/9X FW Rev. 07CK, 1 channel, 64 CCBs > dpt99: DPT PM2022A/9X FW Rev. 005A, 1 channel, 64 CCBs > dpt1: <DPT PM2x22A/9X> at slot 5 on eisa0 > dpt1: No irq?! > device_probe_and_attach: dpt1 attach returned -1 > > (The 'dpt99' lines are an artifact of the mechanism I'm using to complete > the probe.) > > Now, since the resource ranges aren't printed anymore, you can't see that > both cards are using (set to use) the same IRQ. The EISA bus code needs a new maintainer (who could put back such things as resource reporting). Are you interested? You seem to be one of the few people who actively uses this bus. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9906020807140.411-100000>