Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:22:23 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: float@firedrake.org (void) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Solaris 8's split cache Message-ID: <200010251022.DAA19445@usr02.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <20001024193724.A8443@firedrake.org> from "void" at Oct 24, 2000 07:37:24 PM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> http://sunsolve.Sun.COM/pub-cgi/show.pl?target=content/content8#cyclical > > BSD doesn't do anything like this (distinguishing between instructions > and data in the VM cache), does it? Should it? I keep thinking I'm going insane... Is this true? Have they invented the split VM and buffer cache? Or did they invent a "working set quota for all file system data"? Guess you couldn't patent it, if you called it that... 8-p Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010251022.DAA19445>