Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 13:20:12 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New option for newfs(3) to make life with GEOM easier Message-ID: <fbgqlc$5er$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20070903091253.GL54895@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <20070901074803.GM85633@comp.chem.msu.su> <fbd5e6$aia$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070902233930.O1113@woozle.rinet.ru> <fbg2ei$2ab$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070903095344.P17354@woozle.rinet.ru> <9bbcef730709022313i72f93e34ye5fd9f69642b3286@mail.gmail.com> <20070903091253.GL54895@cicely12.cicely.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Bernd Walter wrote: > Don't get me wrong, I'm not against cutting a few sectors per default, > just want to have a fallback. Fallback would be to say "-r 0", presumably. > However, I would still prefer if users get a warning if they try to > use a filesystem, which overflows the media. > I guess the foot-shooting is quite common about this point. How would the file system overflow the media? The case discussed here is shrinking the file system to be a few sectors smaller than the media size (i.e. those few sectors would be unused by the fs). [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG2+3sldnAQVacBcgRAwqUAJ0cYby71s6tBtaK5yOe1GLwzD8M2wCfeLcw 20owqZzjl+xtKOXFLM9tBS0= =6grZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fbgqlc$5er$1>