Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 01:07:42 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPv6 in -current Message-ID: <19981102010742.A5101@nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <199811020523.AAA18222@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from Garrett Wollman on Mon, Nov 02, 1998 at 12:23:38AM -0500 References: <199811010922.LAA05107@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811010922160.306-100000@picnic.mat.net> <199811011929.OAA05742@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <19981101211257.A3217@nuxi.com> <199811020523.AAA18222@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> I frankly don't care that much which IPv6 implementation is chosen.
> >> My concerns are the following:
>
> > So is sounds like those interested in IPv6 have the go-ahead to bring it
> > into -CURRENT.
>
> No, they don't. Read what I wrote (and you oh-so-conveniently deleted).
And why not?
For review they were:
2) that we don't screw any of the existing developers
1) that we make whatever necessary fundamental advances we can in the
network stack before taking on additional deadweight
It is assumed you are working on (1).
So all that those that care about IPv6 need to do is adhear to (2) above.
--
-- David (obrien@NUXI.ucdavis.edu -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981102010742.A5101>