Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:49:11 -0500 From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> To: Unhappy Adobe Customer <bsd_appliance@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SSSCA? Message-ID: <15298.11623.538331.103409@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <20011008193423.77229.qmail@web11901.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20011008193423.77229.qmail@web11901.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Unhappy Adobe Customer <bsd_appliance@yahoo.com> types: > What do you folks think about the "draft" SSSCA? It's the logical next step after the DMCA, and sucks ever so much more so. > If this passes, I think it could essentially outlaw "free software", > "open source" or whatever you want to call it. A lot depends on the licensing of the "required technology". That may well be patented and require a per-user license fee. Some of the proposed technologies have NDA's all over them. If you can't release source to those technologies because of NDA, then it kills open source. If you have to pay a per-user license fee of some kind, it kills free software. If neither of those are true, then it won't make any difference. Even if we miss both of those land mines, the implications are rather frightening. > Even if this isn't done by law, getting software support for > crippled hardware may be all but impossible. What do you think? Again, the proposed hardware solutions all have nasty licensing attached to getting development information - which makes supporting that hardware difficult. <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Q: How do you make the gods laugh? A: Tell them your plans. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15298.11623.538331.103409>